Automated Notification of Responsible Individuals
Organizational performance measures drive behaviors but, in order to be effective, the information they provide must be known and acted upon in a timely manner. Today’s business leaders can easily be overwhelmed with information; obscuring critical performance metric action prompts. Furthermore, the fixed publication frequency of performance monitoring reports may preclude leaders from receiving action-prompting information in a timely manner. Automating performance notifications, triggered at the time of occurrence, can help alleviate these issues.[wcm_restrict plans=”41692, 25542, 25653″]
Automated Notifications
Automated performance notifications can be configured in several ways and tailored to the communication preference of the individual executive or manager. Such notifications are typically triggered by the realization of a predetermined performance threshold value and/or rate of change trend. Minimal detail is contained within the notification itself along with a link or directions to obtain more complete information. Common system generated notification mechanisms include:
- Email sent directly to the executive or manager
- Text message delivered to the executive or manager’s cell phone
- App notification pop-up pushed to the executive or manager’s smart phone
- Notification message within the executive or manager’s enterprise resource planning (ERP) system dashboard
- Hardcopy memo printed and sent to the executive or manager’s office
Less common is having the notification alert sent to the executive or manager’s chief of staff / administrative assistant for review, filtering, and forwarding. In these instances, the communication methods should be based on the subordinate’s preferences.
Automated Notifications for Manually Maintained Performance Metrics
StrategyDriven research reveals that only about forty percent of performance metrics can be fully automated. Consequently, a large portion of an organization’s performance measures will not be supported by the ongoing system monitoring necessary to easily support automated notifications. In these instances, near real-time notifications can be achieved through one of the following options:
- Personnel monitoring the specific parameter make periodic electronic log entries to drive near real-time system monitoring and automated notifications
- Automated or electronically logged proxy measures are used as a notification substitute to prompt the updating and review of the desired performance measure
- Automated or electronically logged predictive performance measures related to the desired metric are used to prompt its updating and review
- Frequency of manual metric updating is increased during critical periods when associated opportunity and/or risk levels are high
Final Thought…
Performance measures drive action in response to opportunities and issues. Automation of performance measure notifications should address both of these circumstances.[/wcm_restrict][wcm_nonmember plans=”41692, 25542, 25653″]
Hi there! Gain access to this article with a StrategyDriven Insights Library – Total Access subscription or buy access to the article itself.
Subscribe to the StrategyDriven Insights Library Sign-up now for your StrategyDriven Insights Library – Total Access subscription for as low as $15 / month (paid annually). Not sure? Click here to learn more. |
Buy the Article Don’t need a subscription? Buy access to Organizational Performance Measures Best Practice 28 – Automated Notification of Responsible Individuals for just $2! [reveal_quick_checkout id=”41691″ checkout_text=”Access the Article Now!”] |
[/wcm_nonmember]
About the Author
Nathan Ives is a StrategyDriven Principal and Host of the StrategyDriven Podcast. For over twenty years, he has served as trusted advisor to executives and managers at dozens of Fortune 500 and smaller companies in the areas of management effectiveness, organizational development, and process improvement. To read Nathan’s complete biography, click here.